<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="/stylesheets/rss.css"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/">
  <channel>
    <title>SourceGear Development Blog comments</title>
    <link>http://vaultblog.sourcegear.com</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <ttl>40</ttl>
    <description>Upcoming changes to Vault 4.1 and Fortress 1.1</description>
    <item>
      <title>"SourceGear Customer Conference Call April 16th " by Jeremy</title>
      <description>It went very well.  We got some good feedback, and several of the issues were already taken care of.  Of the remaining issues, we're working on including fixes for some of them in 4.1.2.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 10:24:57 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:973c05dd-0f93-4030-bf1f-dc171f951fd0</guid>
      <link>http://vaultblog.sourcegear.com/articles/2008/04/09/sourcegear-customer-conference-call-april-16th#comment-69</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>"SourceGear Customer Conference Call April 16th " by Eric D. Burdo</title>
      <description>How'd the conference call go?</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 15:40:39 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:a8e8de3b-e9cd-4c7c-ac55-7cbd7f17f236</guid>
      <link>http://vaultblog.sourcegear.com/articles/2008/04/09/sourcegear-customer-conference-call-april-16th#comment-68</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>"SourceGear at SDWest" by Paul Roub</title>
      <description>Glad we could make it all worth it.

Photographic evidence here: &lt;a href="http://blog.roub.net/2008/03/sd_west_jeremys_scoreboard.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://blog.roub.net/2008/03/sd_west_jeremys_scoreboard.html&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 11:23:17 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:f892dfbf-256f-4c30-82f4-d075d4e113fa</guid>
      <link>http://vaultblog.sourcegear.com/articles/2008/02/12/sourcegear-at-sdwest#comment-67</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>"SourceGear at SDWest" by Cheri Pearson</title>
      <description>So who was the stud that defeated you?  MY HUSBAND !!! Yeah!

I guess that makes it worth not helping with dinner preparations for the past month.

</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 21:56:08 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:31aac435-9471-48ae-9db0-7f054cd1b071</guid>
      <link>http://vaultblog.sourcegear.com/articles/2008/02/12/sourcegear-at-sdwest#comment-66</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>"Vault 4.1 / Fortress 1.1 beta 2 is released" by Paul Roub</title>
      <description>Weeks.  We're aiming for the end of February.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 10:32:39 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:3a8a1a5d-c27c-432f-a3c9-4126d8fe2d83</guid>
      <link>http://vaultblog.sourcegear.com/articles/2008/01/17/vault-4-1-beta-2#comment-65</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>"Vault 4.1 / Fortress 1.1 beta 2 is released" by Mike</title>
      <description>Any insight on when 4.1 will RTM?  Are we looking at days, weeks, months?  This would be helpful for planning purposes.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 10:28:41 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:7c9377e7-d89d-44a1-8e85-2110233db3f0</guid>
      <link>http://vaultblog.sourcegear.com/articles/2008/01/17/vault-4-1-beta-2#comment-64</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>"Vault 4.1 / Fortress 1.1 beta 2 is released" by Steve</title>
      <description>Regarding the new toolbar icons - that is cool, and *pretty please* provide an option to show text on all the toolbar buttons.  That would be wonderful!</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 09:54:19 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:7373d8f2-28ca-45ae-aee0-c16c1faa222e</guid>
      <link>http://vaultblog.sourcegear.com/articles/2008/01/17/vault-4-1-beta-2#comment-63</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>"Beta Secret #2 - Web Diff" by Jeremy</title>
      <description>In Vault 4.0, on the web client login page, you can check the "Remember Login on this Machine" box to remember your login in a more permanent way.  The new web diff has a transaction details link above the diff in the " Version 2 (File Details) vs Version 3 (File Details)" section.  Are you saying that you also want the transaction details link on the blame page?</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 10:36:51 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:b5da989c-80f8-4222-966b-395fb75b8c54</guid>
      <link>http://vaultblog.sourcegear.com/articles/2007/12/12/beta-secret-2-web-diff#comment-62</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>"Beta Secret #2 - Web Diff" by Mike Dimmick</title>
      <description>It's not the web-based view I particularly object to (though tweaking the number of versions to include through a URL parameter is a bit nasty), more the logging in again. This is the only place I have to remember what my password is!

Cross-referencing with the other source files committed in the same change set would be useful (a.k.a. what else did I/he break?)

I confess to using 'blame' even on a project where I'm the only developer, so I can work out which release a particular change went into. That requires a bit of cross-referencing with version history and labels.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 10:15:00 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:99604b75-ddc8-4789-a8ee-614ad1d1e211</guid>
      <link>http://vaultblog.sourcegear.com/articles/2007/12/12/beta-secret-2-web-diff#comment-61</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>"Vault 4.1 beta 1 is released" by James</title>
      <description>Thanks for posting this blog on the 4.1. It was very helpful and well written. </description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2007 16:41:23 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:32c5b907-34fc-4723-906c-d231098b51f8</guid>
      <link>http://vaultblog.sourcegear.com/articles/2007/11/26/vault-4-1-beta-1-is-released#comment-60</link>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
